ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Multi-parametric MRI combined with radiomics for the diagnosis and grading of endometrial fibrosis.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the application of multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) combined with radiomics in diagnosing and grading endometrial fibrosis (EF).
methodsA total of 74 patients with severe endometrial fibrosis (SEF), 41 patients with mild to moderate fibrosis (MMEF) confirmed by hysteroscopy, and 40 healthy women of reproductive age were prospectively enrolled. The enrolled data were randomly stratified and divided into a train set (108 cases: 28 healthy women, 29 with MMEF, and 51 with SEF) and a test set (47 cases: 12 healthy women, 12 MMEF and 23 SEF) at a ratio of 7:3. All participants underwent T2 and DWI sequence scans. By freely delineating the volume of interest (VOI) of the endometrium in three subgroups, radiomic features were extracted and selected. Two feature selection methods and four machine learning (ML) classifiers were combined in pairs to establish five prediction models [model
resultsThe "UFS-LR" model, which combined unsupervised feature selection (UFS) with the logistic regression (LR) classifier, performed the best, with an average AUC of 0.92 on the test set. Among the five models constructed via UFS-LR, model
conclusionMP-MRI radiomics analysis using ML has excellent performance in grading EF. This approach is non-invasive and has the potential to reduce the reliance on hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39841225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.