ArticleArchives of microbiology2025
Potent antibacterial and cytotoxic bioactive compounds from endophytic fungi Diaporthe sp. associated with Salacia intermedia.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization and biological activities of endophytic bacteria from Vernonia anthelmintica flowers.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Endophytic fungi as a source of antimicrobial compounds against emerging methicillin-resistantMycology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibacterial screening of endophytic fungi from Salacia intermedia identified Diaporthe longicolla as a potent strain exhibiting good activity against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with an MIC of 39.1 µg/mL. Scale-up fermentation and chromatographic purification of this strain yielded three known compounds, which were cytochalasin J (1), cytochalasin H (2), and dicerandrol C (3), as identified by liquid chromatography - high mass resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Among those compounds, dicerandrol C exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against ATCC and multidrug-resistant strains of Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa, and multidrug-resistant strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli, with MIC values ranging from 1.04 to 33.30 µM. Furthermore, dicerandrol C outperformed tetracycline in antibacterial efficacy against S. aureus ATCC 6538 and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains (MIC of 1.04 µM). Further antibacterial evaluation showed that cytochalasin J (221.43 µM), cytochalasin H (202.59 µM), and dicerandrol C (tested at its MIC values of 1.04 µM for S. aureus ATCC 6538 and 16.65 µM for P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442) significantly inhibited bacterial biofilm formation. The biofilm inhibition percentages ranged from 61.09 to 78.17% for S. aureus and 41.22-56.83% for P. aeruginosa. In cytotoxicity assays against MCF-7 cells, all three compounds reduced cell viability (48.68-74.50%), with dicerandrol C demonstrating the highest potency. These findings highlight the potential of dicerandrol C as a powerful antibacterial and cytotoxic agent, facilitating further investigations into its therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39841194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.