Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841191›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Nanoparticle-assisted PCR: fundamentals, mechanisms, and forensic implications.

Kamayani Vajpayee, Vidhi Paida, Ritesh K Shukla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Principles of nano physics in forensic medicine.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kamayani VajpayeeBiological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Central Campus, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Vidhi PaidaBiological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Central Campus, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Ritesh K ShuklaBiological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Central Campus, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. ritesh.shukla@ahduni.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) has transformed forensic DNA analysis but is still limited when dealing with compromised trace or inhibitor-containing samples. Nanotechnology has been integrated into nanoPCR (nanoparticle-assisted PCR) to overcome these obstacles. Nanomaterials improve PCR sensitivity, selectivity, and efficiency. Examples of these materials are semiconductor quantum dots and metal nanoparticles. They enhance DNA binding to primers, stabilize enzymes, and function as effective heat conductors, making accurate amplification possible even with tainted samples. The developments in nanoPCR have potential uses in forensics, as they allow for the more sensitive analysis of smaller, polluted, or deteriorated samples. Nevertheless, there are methodological and ethical issues. To provide credible and legitimate forensic evidence, rigorous validation and standardization of NanoPCR techniques are vital. The article addresses the relevant ethical and methodological aspects in forensic casework while examining the integration of nanotechnology into PCR.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingNanoparticlesNanotechnologyPolymerase Chain ReactionDNAForensic GeneticsHumansMetal NanoparticlesQuantum DotsDNAForensic DNANanoparticlesNanoPCRPCR InhibitionPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.