Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841099›Full record

ArticleCancer research2025

SMAD4 and KRAS Status Shapes Cancer Cell-Stromal Cross-Talk and Therapeutic Response in Pancreatic Cancer.

Eloise G Lloyd, Muntadher Jihad, Judhell S Manansala, Wenlong Li, Priscilla S W Cheng, Gianluca Mucciolo, Marta Zaccaria, Sara Pinto Teles, Joaquín Araos Henríquez, Sneha Harish and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Eloise G LloydUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5258-4111
Muntadher JihadUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-3401
Judhell S ManansalaUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0567-443X
Wenlong LiUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5507-3042
Priscilla S W ChengUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2384-0702
Gianluca MuccioloUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7296-0217
Marta ZaccariaUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-346X
Sara Pinto TelesUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7409-9651
Joaquín Araos HenríquezUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-7672
Sneha HarishUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-6440-416X
Rebecca BraisHistopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-7848-5994
Sally AshworthUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-1857-9712
Weike LuoUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-1337-6484
Paul M JohnsonUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-3073-299X
Lisa VeghiniDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-1189
Mireia VallespinosUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-6042
Vincenzo CorboDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-8009
Giulia BiffiUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4592-0970

Funding

Cambridge Trust (Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust)Cancer Research UK CGCATF-2021/100027Cancer Research UK (CRUK)Medical Research Council (MRC)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund (PCRF)Pancreatic Cancer UK (PCUK)US Department of Defence
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) contains an extensive stroma that modulates response to therapy, contributing to the dismal prognosis associated with this cancer. Evidence suggests that PDAC stromal composition is shaped by mutations within malignant cells, but most previous work has focused on preclinical models driven by KrasG12D and mutant Trp53. Elucidation of the contribution of additional known oncogenic drivers, including KrasG12V mutation and Smad4 loss, is needed to increase the understanding of malignant cell-stromal cell cross-talk in PDAC. In this study, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to analyze the cellular landscape of Trp53-mutant mouse models driven by KrasG12D or KrasG12V, in which Smad4 was wild type or deleted. KrasG12DSmad4-deleted PDAC developed a fibro-inflammatory rich stroma with increased malignant JAK/STAT cell signaling and enhanced therapeutic response to JAK/STAT inhibition. SMAD4 loss in KrasG12V PDAC differently altered the tumor microenvironment compared with KrasG12D PDAC, and the malignant compartment lacked JAK/STAT signaling dependency. Thus, malignant cell genotype affects cancer cell and stromal cell phenotypes in PDAC, directly affecting therapeutic efficacy. Significance: SMAD4 loss differentially impacts malignant cell-stromal cell signaling and treatment sensitivity of pancreatic tumors driven by KRASG12D or KRASG12V, highlighting the importance of understanding genotype-phenotype relationships for precision therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Smad4 ProteinStromal CellsAnimalsCell CommunicationHumansMiceMutationSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentTumor Suppressor Protein p53Hras protein, mouseKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Smad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanSmad4 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID39841099
PMCPMC7617379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.