ArticleResuscitation2024
The impact of pediatric post-cardiac arrest care on survival: A multicenter review from the AHA get with the Guidelines®-resuscitation post-cardiac arrest care registry.
Article in Resuscitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Pediatric cardiac arrest registries and survival outcomes: A European study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimAdherence to post-cardiac arrest care (PCAC) recommendations is associated with improved outcomes for adults. We aimed to describe the survival impact of meeting American Heart Association (AHA) PCAC guidelines in children after cardiac arrest.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using Get With The Guidelines® Resuscitation's (GWTG®-R) registry to describe the PCAC of patients ≤ 18 years old who suffered an in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA or OHCA). We evaluated the association between the absence of hypotension and fever in the initial 24 h following return of circulation (ROC) with survival to hospital discharge. We reviewed the utilization of monitoring/evaluation tools recommended in pediatric PCAC guidelines: electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and neuro-imaging.
resultsWe found 385 pediatric patients who suffered an IHCA or OHCA from 2015 through 2019 and survived at least 6 h post-ROC. Sixty-six percent of patients survived to hospital discharge. Following ROC, 56% of patients had EEG monitoring, 80% had an ECG performed, 47% had a head CT, and 26% had a cerebral MRI. In the initial 24 h post-ROC, 92% of patients did not have hypotension and 79% were afebrile. Patients without hypotension in the initial 24 h post-ROC had higher odds of survival to hospital discharge than those with hypotension (aOR 4.96; 95% CI 2.07, 11.90; p = 0.0003), adjusting for age and cardiac arrest location. Patients without hypotension and without fever in the initial 24 h post-ROC had higher odds of survival to hospital discharge compared to patients who had either hypotension or fever or both (aOR 1.98; 95% CI 1.06,3.71; p = 0.034).
conclusionIn this retrospective multicenter registry study, absence of both post-cardiac arrest hypotension and fever were associated with increased odds of survival to hospital discharge. Further research is needed to understand the full impact of PCAC recommendation compliance on survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.