Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840828›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025

Combining computational modeling and experimental library screening to affinity-mature VEEV-neutralizing antibody F5.

Christopher A Sumner, Jennifer L Schwedler, Katherine Maia McCoy, Jack Holland, Valerie Duva, Daniel Gelperin, Valeria Busygina, Maxwell A Stefan, Daniella V Martinez, Miranda A Juarros and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christopher A SumnerDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7572-4615
Jennifer L SchwedlerDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.
Katherine Maia McCoyDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2546-6347
Jack HollandDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Valerie DuvaAbcam, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Daniel GelperinAbcam, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Valeria BusyginaAbcam, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Maxwell A StefanDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.
Daniella V MartinezDepartment of Molecular and Microbiology, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Miranda A JuarrosDepartment of Molecular and Microbiology, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Ashlee M PhillipsDivision of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.
Dina R WeilhammerDivision of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.
Gevorg GrigoryanDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4645-7666
Michael S KentDepartment of Molecular and Microbiology, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-9457
Brooke N HarmonDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered monoclonal antibodies have proven to be highly effective therapeutics in recent viral outbreaks. However, despite technical advancements, an ability to rapidly adapt or increase antibody affinity and by extension, therapeutic efficacy, has yet to be fully realized. We endeavored to stand-up such a pipeline using molecular modeling combined with experimental library screening to increase the affinity of F5, a monoclonal antibody with potent neutralizing activity against Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV), to recombinant VEEV (IAB) E1E2 antigen. We modeled the F5/E1E2 binding interface and generated predictions for mutations to improve binding using a Rosetta-based approach and dTERMen, an informatics approach. The modeling was complicated by the fact that a high-resolution structure of F5 is not available and the H3 loop of F5 exceeds the length for which current modeling approaches can determine a unique structure. A subset of the predicted mutations from both methods were incorporated into a phage display library of scFvs. This library and a library generated by error-prone PCR were screened for binding affinity to the recombinant antigen. Results from the screens identified favorable mutations which were incorporated into 12 human-IgG1 variants. The best variant, containing eight mutations, improved KD from 0.63 nM (parental) to 0.01 nM. While this did not improve neutralization or therapeutic potency of F5 against IAB, it did increase cross-reactivity to other closely related VEEV epizootic and enzootic strains, demonstrating the potential of this method to rapidly adapt existing therapeutics to emerging viral strains.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEncephalitis Virus, Venezuelan EquineSingle-Chain AntibodiesAntibody AffinityHumansModels, MolecularPeptide LibraryAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodiesaffinity‐maturationanti‐viralcomputational modelinglibrary screeningtherapeutic antibodies

Identifiers

PMID39840828
PMCPMC11752144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.