Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840815›Full record

ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2025

Supervision of Pediatric Anesthesia After-Hours: A Survey of Pediatric Anesthetists in Australia and New Zealand.

Steven Cai, Fiona Taverner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven CaiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-1583-2168
Fiona TavernerFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-0643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter-hours pediatric anesthesia may pose increased risks, with a heightened potential for sudden cardio-respiratory decline. While mortality rates are low in Australia and New Zealand, critical events and morbidity occur more frequently and present ongoing challenges. However, little is known about how trainees are supervised during these high-risk periods.

methodsAn anonymized online survey of members of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia in New Zealand and Australia (SPANZA) was conducted to explore supervising anesthetists attitudes towards after-hours supervision. The survey examined the influence of patient age, medical history, trainee experience, and surgery type on supervision practices.

resultsRespondents identified age and physical status as key risk factors but reported providing less direct supervision than recommended by international studies, especially for non-complex surgeries in healthy children. Trainee experience was a significant factor in supervision decisions.

conclusionPediatric anesthetists in Australia and New Zealand recognize major risk factors but tend to supervise more remotely after-hours. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of these supervision practices on outcomes.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareAnesthesiaAnesthesiologyAnesthetistsPediatricsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandPediatric AnesthesiaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39840815
PMCPMC12060079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.