Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840718›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025

Chemical and temporal manipulation of early steps in protein assembly tunes the structure and intermolecular interactions of protein-based materials.

Valeria Italia, Amanda Jons, Bhavika Kaparthi, Britt Faulk, Marco Maccarini, Paolo Bertoncello, Ken Meissner, Donald K Martin, Sarah E Bondos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valeria ItaliaDepartment of Physics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Amanda JonsDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Bhavika KaparthiDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Britt FaulkDepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Marco MaccariniUniversity Grenoble Alpes, SyNaBi, TIMC-IMAG/CNRS/INSERM, UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.
Paolo BertoncelloDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ken MeissnerDepartment of Physics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Donald K MartinUniversity Grenoble Alpes, SyNaBi, TIMC-IMAG/CNRS/INSERM, UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-2372
Sarah E BondosDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9673-4169

Funding

Cotutelle Fellowship from the ubBIO projectIDEX Strategic Alliance between University Grenoble Alpes (France) and Swansea University (UK)NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila intrinsically disordered protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) undergoes a series of phase transitions, beginning with noncovalent interactions between apparently randomly organized monomers, and evolving over time to form increasingly ordered coacervates. This assembly process ends when specific dityrosine covalent bonds lock the monomers in place, forming macroscale materials. Inspired by this hierarchical, multistep assembly process, we analyzed the impact of protein concentration, assembly time, and subphase composition on the early, noncovalent stages of Ubx assembly, which are extremely sensitive to their environment. We discovered that in low salt buffers, we can generate a new type of Ubx material from early coacervates using 5-fold less protein, and 100-fold less assembly time. Comparison of the new materials with standard Ubx fibers also revealed differences in the extent of wrinkling on the fiber surface. A new image analysis technique based on autocorrelation of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images was developed to quantify these structural differences. These differences extend to the molecular level: new materials form more dityrosine covalent cross-links per monomer, but without requiring the specific tyrosine residues necessary for crosslinking previously established materials. We conclude that varying the assembly conditions represents a facile and inexpensive process for creating new materials. Most new biopolymers are created by changing the composition of the monomers or the method used to drive assembly. In contrast, in this study we used the same monomers and assembly approach, but altered the assembly time and chemical environment to create a new material with unique properties.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsTranscription FactorsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsTranscription Factorsaggregationbiomaterialscoacervationintrinsically disordered proteinsphase separationprotein‐based materialsself‐healing

Identifiers

PMID39840718
PMCPMC11751906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.