ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
An International Survey on the Use of a Polyrevitalizing Solution With or Without Other Aesthetic Procedures in the Daily Practice of Aesthetic Physicians.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Mucosa Remodeling Induced by Injecting New Cellular Treatment Factor (NCTF) and Human-derived Exosomes (ASCE & CellExosome).Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Effects of New Cellular Treatment Factor and Human Exosome Injection on Intact Skin Regeneration in a Randomized In Vivo Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler for Neck Wrinkles: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNCTF135HA, a versatile polyrevitalizing solution, is a potent agent for enhancing skin quality, radiance, moisture, vitality, and diminishing fine wrinkles caused by aging factors. Data demonstrate a divergence in its application from skin quality enhancement to treatment of vitiligo lesions. To know more precisely about the protocol of use among providers, alone or in combination with other procedures, we performed an international survey.
methodA Steering Committee of dermatologists, aesthetic surgeons, and physicians developed a 32-question questionnaire based on a literature review. Hosted online from January to March 2024, it targeted healthcare professionals experienced in polyrevitalization. Responses were analyzed anonymously and reported descriptively.
resultsPractitioners adopt a balanced approach: half of their patients receiving classic Polyrevitalization (NCTF135HA alone) and the other half undergoing combination therapy (NCTF135HA with another aesthetic procedure). Most administer NCTF135HA across multiple sessions, typically three (39.7%). In combination therapy, 55.5% of practitioners use NCTF135HA for medical purposes, targeting Melasma (53.1%) and Rosacea (45.0%) for instance. Aesthetic use is prevalent, with 94.2% employing NCTF135HA for skin wrinkles (79.9%), and refreshment, rejuvenation, and hydration (73.4%). Combining NCTF135HA with hyaluronic acid (71.2%) and botulinum toxin (49.1%) is common, alongside microneedling (50.2%), peelings (32.4%), and fractional radiofrequency (25.6%). LIMITATIONS AND
conclusionOur survey showed a homogenous distribution of NCTF135HA utilization, indicating a consensus on its application across diverse demographics. This consistency highlights its widespread acknowledgment and efficacy in various aesthetic and clinical settings. Limitations include a large respondent group from Mexico and many respondents with less than 10 years of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.