ArticleCurrent protocols2025
Plasmid Library Construction From Genomic DNA.
Article in Current protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Microdroplet-Based Functional Genomic Screening Pipeline by Combination of DNA Nanoflowers and PURExpress Cell-Free Expression.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- Microbial community of civet excreta fed by robusta cherry coffee in Indonesian civet coffee production.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- Plasmid Library Construction From Genomic DNA.Current protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional genomic approaches have been effective at uncovering the function of uncharacterized genes and identifying new functions for known genes. Often these approaches rely on an in vivo screen or selection to associate genes with a phenotype of interest. These selections and screens are dependent upon the expression of proteins encoded in genomic DNA from an expression vector, such as a plasmid. Despite the utility of genomic DNA plasmid libraries, the protocols for their construction have remained unchanged in the past 40 years. Here, we present a procedure for constructing plasmid libraries from genomic DNA. This procedure is scalable and relies on simple techniques and common laboratory equipment and reagents. Briefly, the genomic DNA is extracted and then physically fragmented with a g-TUBE, overhangs are repaired, and fragments are selectively purified with magnetic beads to obtain an average fragment size of 2.5 kb. Blunted fragments are ligated into a blunt-end-digested and dephosphorylated vector. Finally, the library is amplified by electroporating the ligation into a high-transformation-efficiency Escherichia coli strain and extracting the plasmid DNA from the transformants. As a proof of concept, we built and sequenced three genomic libraries from different genomes and calculated their coverage using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Plasmid library construction Alternate Protocol: Selection of gDNA fragments using SageELF gel fractionator Support Protocol 1: Extraction of gDNA with phenol/chloroform Support Protocol 2: Vector preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.