ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Clinical significance of stratifying prostate cancer patients through specific circulating genes.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value and early response stratification of a multi-biomarker panel in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient stratification remains a challenge for optimal treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). This clinical heterogeneity implies intra-tumoural heterogeneity, with different prostate epithelial cell subtypes not all targeted by current treatments. We reported that such cell subtypes are traceable in liquid biopsies through representative transcripts. Expanding on this concept, we included 57 genes representing cell subtypes, drug targets and relevant to resistance as non-invasive biomarkers for stratification. This panel was tested by RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) in blood of controls and different categories of PCa patients. Overall, circulating transcripts showed predictive value throughout the disease. Those with aggressive pathological features such as intra-ductal carcinoma at diagnosis showed more genes over-expressed. In metastatic patients, signatures of subtypes or resistance were associated with treatments, progression-free survival and overall survival. Altogether, testing markers of cell diversity, an intrinsic feature of tumours, and drug targets via liquid biopsies represents a valuable means to stratify patients and predict responses to current or new therapeutic modalities. Over-expressed drug target genes suggest potential benefit from targeted treatments, justifying new clinical trials to offer patient-tailored strategies to eventually impact on PCa mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.