ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Knockout of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR RNP-Mediated Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Plants: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions for Tree Species.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Red and Far-Red LED Lighting Enhances Protoplast-to-Plant Regeneration in Broccoli (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biodiversity and genetic improvement ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Development of a highly efficient protoplast regeneration and transfection protocol for enhancing CRISPR genome editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- A Brief History of Canola Genetic Gains: From Classical Breeding to Genome Editing.Physiologia plantarumReview
- Evaluation of Bna.SCT and Bna.REF1 as Target Genes to Reduce Sinapine in Rapeseed Using a Protoplast-Based CRISPR RNP Approach.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapeseed (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.