Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Specific and sensitive detection of bovine coronavirus using CRISPR-Cas13a combined with RT-RAA technology.

Zili Liang, Ruxing Luo, Qifu He, Cheng Tang, Zhidong Zhang, Yanmin Li, Zijing Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zili Liang *Key Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Ruxing Luo *Key Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Qifu HeWuhou District Health Hospital for Women & Children, Chengdu, China.
Cheng TangKey Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Zhidong ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Yanmin LiKey Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Zijing GuoKey Laboratory of Animal Medicine at Southwest Minzu University of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) is an important pathogen of enteric and respiratory disease in cattle, resulting in huge economic losses to the beef and dairy industries worldwide. A specific and sensitive detection assay for BCoV is critical to the early-stage disease prevention and control. Methods: We established a specific, sensitive, and stable assay for BCoV nucleic acid detection based on CRISPR/Cas13a combined with reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) technology. The specific primers for RT-RAA and CRISPR RNA (crRNA) were designed in the conserved region of the BCoV nucleocapsid (N) gene. Results: The detection limit of the RT-RAA CRISPR/Cas13a assays for BCoV detection was 1.72 copies/μl, and there were no cross-reactions with the other 10 common bovine enteric and respiratory disease-associated pathogens. The coefficient of variations (CVs) of within and between batches were less than 4.98 and 4.58%, respectively. The RT-RAA-CRISPR/Cas13a assays work well in clinical samples of cattle and yak, the BCoV positive rate of 84 clinical samples detected by RT-RAA-CRISPR/Cas13a assays was 58.3% (49/84), it was notably higher than that of RT-qPCR (2.4%, 2/84; Discussion: A specific, sensitive, and stable assay based on RT-RAA-CRISPR/Cas13a assays for BCoV was developed, providing new technical support for the clinical detection and epidemiological monitoring of BCoV.

Indexed as

bovine coronavirusCRISPR/Cas13adiagnosticnucleic acid detectionRT-RAA

Identifiers

PMID39840345
PMCPMC11749252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.