Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840249›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2025

Cutting-Edge Technologies of Meat Analogs: A Review.

Seung Yun Lee, Da Young Lee, Ermie Mariano, Jinmo Park, Dahee Han, Yeongwoo Choi, Jin Soo Kim, Ji Won Park, Seok Namkung, Colin Venter and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seung Yun LeeDivision of Animal Science, Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-6517
Da Young LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-0815
Ermie MarianoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-4603
Jinmo ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9626-1025
Dahee HanDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6423-3414
Yeongwoo ChoiDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1882-4890
Jin Soo KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7974-7885
Ji Won ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9500-5763
Seok NamkungDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4533-7971
Colin VenterDepartment Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-5809
Sun Jin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-5852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the recent research trends of alternative protein foods being developed to replace traditional livestock foods and thus determine the current state of the technology and the potential for industrialization. The results of this study showed that the technology related to cultured meat has not yet reached industrialization. However, serum-free media development, technologies to improve culture efficiency, and technologies to improve taste and flavor are being researched. In addition, the research on improving the production efficiency of cultured meat is increasingly expanding from using muscle satellite cells obtained from animal muscles to research on cell lines or immortalized cell lines. Edible insect-derived proteins have a wide range of food applications, and researchers are actively working on utilizing their functional properties. Plant-derived protein materials are also being studied to improve the flavor and texture of plant-based meat products to make them more similar to traditional livestock foods, as well as to remove allergens. In conclusion, despite ongoing technological development, the industrialization of cultured meat is expected to take some time. There is a growing body of research on the types, functionalities, extraction, and texturizing technologies of plant-derived, mycoprotein, or insect-derived ingredients for formulating meat alternative products, and it is expected that improved products will continue to enter the market. Although animal product substitutes are not expected to significantly replace traditional livestock products, continuous improvement research will contribute to the expansion of the alternative protein food market.

Indexed as

cultured meatedible insect-based meatmeat alternativesplant-based meatsustainable protein sources

Identifiers

PMID39840249
PMCPMC11743842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.