ReviewFood science of animal resources2025
Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.
Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid population growth and a corresponding increase in the demand for animal-derived proteins have led to food supply challenges and the need for alternative and sustainable meat production methods. Therefore, this study explored the importance of cell engineering technology-based three-dimensional bioprinting and bioinks, which play key roles in cultured meat production. In cultured meat production, bioinks have a significant effect on cell growth, differentiation, and mechanical stability. Hence, in this study, the characteristics of animal-, plant-, and marine-based bioinks were compared and analyzed, and the impact of each bioink on cultured meat production was evaluated. In particular, animal-based bioinks have the potential to produce cultured meat that is similar to conventional meat and are considered the most suitable bioinks for commercialization. Although plant- and marine-based bioinks are ecofriendly and have fewer religious restrictions, they are limited in terms of mechanical stability and consumer acceptance. Therefore, further research is required to develop and apply optimal animal-based bioinks for commercialization of cultured meat, particularly to improve its mechanical compatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.