Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840193›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Genetic Analysis of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate Detected in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia Cases.

Ryuta Watanabe, Noriyoshi Miura, Mie Kurata, Riko Kitazawa, Tadahiko Kikugawa, Takashi Saika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryuta WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, JPN.
Noriyoshi MiuraDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, JPN.
Mie KurataDepartment of Analytical Pathology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, JPN.
Riko KitazawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, JPN.
Tadahiko KikugawaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, JPN.
Takashi SaikaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The accurate diagnosis of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is occasionally challenging due to the similarity in pathological morphology between IDC-P and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). In this report, we reviewed the pathology of cases previously diagnosed as HGPIN to search for IDC-P cases effectively. In addition, we examined whether those cases had genetic abnormalities. Methods We reviewed 98 patients with HGPIN who underwent prostatectomy at our hospital between 2011 and 2021. They were reviewed by three pathologists to search for IDC-P findings by adding immunostaining for basement membrane markers. Genetic testing of prostatectomy specimens was performed to identify the presence of gene mutations. Results The typical IDC-P was diagnosed in two of the 98 patients. The Gleason score of background prostate cancer (PCa) was 4+5 and 4+4. Genetic testing revealed several mutations in DNA repair-related genes, such as

Indexed as

basal cell staininggenetic analysishigh-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasiahr gene mutationsintraductal carcinoma of the prostate

Identifiers

PMID39840193
PMCPMC11747056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.