ArticleCureus2024
Dynamics of Team-Based Learning in Molecular Biology: Insights and Reflections From Undergraduate Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the dynamics of collaborative learning in team-based learning (TBL) through students' reflections and feedback.
methodsA phenomenological mixed-methods approach was adopted where the survey and reflections were conducted concurrently after the TBL session and the results were analyzed. The study employed a mini-cluster technique to include all first-year MBBS students of batch 2023-24 with an age range between 19 and 22 years. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from feedback and reflections submitted by 107 first-year MBBS students at the end of the TBL session.
resultsThe study found five main themes related to students' engagement with the session, i.e., (1) conceptual clarity as the foundation, (2) collaborative learning culture, (3) communication skills, (4) informative and useful team discussions, and (5) interactive learning for team development. The majority of the respondents, 93 (87%), listened to classmates and coordinated with group members in discussion; 77 (72%) were willing to learn from other group members and contribute ideas to them; 79 (74%) came prepared for the session; and 75 (70%) found learning material assigned to them as appropriate. Respondents had positive perceptions regarding their participation in group work and were strongly inclined to agree with the statements provided.
conclusionThe study highlights the positive effects of TBL in promoting peer-to-peer engagement, active engagement, teamwork skills, and knowledge sharing among undergraduate medical students, ultimately contributing to an effective learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.