ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A randomized sequential allocation study on the optimum programmed intermittent epidural boluses interval time with different concentrations of ropivacaine combined with the dural puncture epidural technique for labor analgesia.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective Dose 90 of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Volume at Three Ropivacaine Concentrations with Dural Puncture Epidural for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Sequential Allocation Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Determination the ED90s of Different Concentrations of Initial Ropivacaine Volume for Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural: A Randomized Sequential Allocation Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The combined technique of programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) and dural puncture epidural (DPE) is currently considered a more effective mode for labor analgesia. We investigated the optimal interval time for PIEB administration with different concentrations of ropivacaine combined with the DPE for labor analgesia. Methods: Ninety patients with cervical dilation of <5 cm and a VAS score >5 were randomly assigned to receive labor analgesia with ropivacaine at concentrations of 0.075% (0.075% group), 0.1% (0.1% group), and 0.125% (0.125% group). In each group, an initial administration of a combination of ropivacaine 12 mL and sufentanil 0.3 μg/mL was followed by an additional dose of ropivacaine 10 mL and sufentanil 0.3 μg/mL after 30 min. The initial PIEB interval time was set at 40 min for the first patient in each group, and subsequent interval times for the following patients were adjusted based on meeting analgesic needs (VAS score ≤1) with a gradient of 10 min. The primary outcome was the ED90 of interval time required to achieve analgesic needs during PIEB with different concentrations of ropivacaine, employing an up-and-down sequential allocation method. Results: The optimal PIEB interval times for ropivacaine concentrations of 0.075%, 0.1%, and 0.125% were determined to be 40.9 (95% CI, 35.3-45.8), 45.3 (95% CI, 39.3-51.5), and 52.9 (95% CI, 46.8-59.3) minutes respectively, while comparable maternal and neonatal outcomes were observed across all groups. Conclusion: When PIEB is combined with DPE for labor analgesia, the optimal PIEB interval times for ropivacaine concentrations of 0.075%, 0.1%, and 0.125% were determined to be 41, 45, and 53 min respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.