ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Application of MRI image segmentation algorithm for brain tumors based on improved YOLO.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-precision brain tumor segmentation with switchable normalization in faster R-CNN architecture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- YOLO-LS: a novel deep learning framework for brain tumor segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep neural network with PCA based features optimization for enhancing brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mamba-based brain tumor segmentation of incomplete multi-modal MR images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Latest Advancements and Future Directions in Prostate Cancer Surgery: Reducing Invasiveness and Expanding Indications.Cancers · 2025Review
- CervSpineNet: a hybrid deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of cervical spinous processes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Application research on YOLOv5 model based on Lightweight Atrous Attention Module in brain tumor MRI image segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Application and improvement of YOLO11 for brain tumor detection in medical images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assist in the rapid clinical identification of brain tumor types while achieving segmentation detection, this study investigates the feasibility of applying the deep learning YOLOv5s algorithm model to the segmentation of brain tumor magnetic resonance images and optimizes and upgrades it on this basis. Methods: The research institute utilized two public datasets of meningioma and glioma magnetic resonance imaging from Kaggle. Dataset 1 contains a total of 3,223 images, and Dataset 2 contains 216 images. From Dataset 1, we randomly selected 3,000 images and used the Labelimg tool to annotate the cancerous regions within the images. These images were then divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. The remaining 223 images, along with Dataset 2, were ultimately used as the internal test set and external test set, respectively, to evaluate the model's segmentation effect. A series of optimizations were made to the original YOLOv5 algorithm, introducing the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP), Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), Coordinate Attention (CA) for structural improvement, resulting in several optimized versions, namely YOLOv5s-ASPP, YOLOv5s-CBAM, YOLOv5s-CA, YOLOv5s-ASPP-CBAM, and YOLOv5s-ASPP-CA. The training and validation sets were input into the original YOLOv5s model, five optimized models, and the YOLOv8s model for 100 rounds of iterative training. The best weight file of the model with the best evaluation index in the six trained models was used for the final test of the test set. Results: After iterative training, the seven models can segment and recognize brain tumor magnetic resonance images. Their precision rates on the validation set are 92.5, 93.5, 91.2, 91.8, 89.6, 90.8, and 93.1%, respectively. The corresponding recall rates are 84, 85.3, 85.4, 84.7, 87.3, 85.4, and 91.9%. The best weight file of the model with the best evaluation index among the six trained models was tested on the test set, and the improved model significantly enhanced the image segmentation ability compared to the original model. Conclusion: Compared with the original YOLOv5s model, among the five improved models, the improved YOLOv5s-ASPP model significantly enhanced the segmentation ability of brain tumor magnetic resonance images, which is helpful in assisting clinical diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.