Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839997›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Logistics Management Information System (LMIS) for Health Commodities at Public Health Facilities in Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia: A Data Quality Evaluation Survey.

Zelalem Tilahun Mekonen, Denny J Cho, Teferi Gedif Fenta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zelalem Tilahun MekonenDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-5859-2705
Denny J ChoLogistics Department, Kyrgyz State Technical University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.ORCID 0009-0005-0184-965X
Teferi Gedif FentaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Access to essential medicines is limited in developing countries mainly due to inefficiencies in health supply chain management, such as the absence of standard monitoring frameworks and poorly designed Logistics Management Information Systems (LMIS). Health supply chain managers need accurate and timely data for decision-making. However, routine health information systems suffer from poor data quality, reliance on paper-based reports, insufficient logistic formats, inadequate infrastructure, and limited human resources. Objective: This study evaluates the data quality of LMIS for health commodities in public health facilities in the Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia. Methods: The study was conducted in Ethiopia's Amhara National Regional State. The study employed an institution-based concurrent mixed-methods design. Data collection involved 102 facilities selected through multi-stage stratified random sampling, adhering to sampling criteria set by USAID's Logistics Indicators Assessment Tool (LIAT). Data abstraction checklists were used to collect data. Results: Of the seven tracer medicines selected to evaluate data quality, there was substantial variability in inventory accuracy rates. Inventory discrepancies were significant, highlighting potential issues with manual and digital record-keeping systems, with overall mean physical and electronic inventory accuracy rates of 74.7% and 70.6%, respectively. Additionally, the Report and Requisition Form (RRF) showed trends of timely submission, with the overall mean percentage completeness for the seven tracer medicines at 90.2%. However, the data quality experienced fluctuations, with the overall average percentage of legality (authorization of LMIS reports) and the accuracy of the RRF at 77.2% and 76%, respectively. Conclusion and Recommendation: The evaluation of data quality revealed significant discrepancies in physical and electronic records, with notable fluctuations in completeness, legality, legibility, and accuracy within the health LMIS. To rectify these issues, robust data quality verification processes, clear guidelines, targeted interventions, strengthened monitoring systems, regular audits, and comprehensive training for health supply chain staff are needed.

Indexed as

data qualityevaluationhealth facilitiesLMISperformanceRRF

Identifiers

PMID39839997
PMCPMC11748753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.