Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839996›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

An Efficient Dual-Sampling Approach for Chest CT Diagnosis.

Khalaf Alshamrani, Hassan A Alshamrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khalaf AlshamraniRadiology Sciences Department, College of Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-1752
Hassan A AlshamraniRadiology Sciences Department, College of Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This paper aimed to enhance the diagnostic process of lung abnormalities in computed tomography (CT) images, particularly in distinguishing cancer cells from normal chest tissue. The rapid and uneven growth of cancer cells, presenting with variable symptoms, necessitates an advanced approach for accurate identification. Objective: To develop a dual-sampling network targeting lung infection regions to address the diagnostic challenge. The network was designed to adapt to the uneven distribution of infection areas, which could be predominantly minor or major in different regions. Methods: A total of 150 CT images were analyzed using the dual-sampling network. Two sampling approaches were compared: the proposed dual-sampling technique and a uniform sampling method. Results: The dual-sampling network demonstrated superior performance in detecting lung abnormalities compared to uniform sampling. The uniform sampling method, the network results: an F1-Score of 94.2%, accuracy of 94.5%, sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity of 95.4%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.4%. However, with the proposed dual-sampling method, the network reached an F1-score of 94.9%, accuracy of 95.2%, specificity of 96.1%, sensitivity of 94.2%, and an AUC of 95.5%. Conclusion: This study suggests that the proposed dual-sampling network significantly improves the precision of lung abnormality diagnosis in CT images. This advancement has the potential to aid radiologists in making more accurate diagnoses, ultimately benefiting patient treatment and contributing to better overall population health. The efficiency and effectiveness of the dual-sampling approach in managing the uneven distribution of lung infection areas are key to its success.

Indexed as

balanced class samplingdual samplingKNNlung cancerSVMunder sampling and over fittinguniform sampling

Identifiers

PMID39839996
PMCPMC11748922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.