ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Grammar-constrained decoding for structured information extraction with fine-tuned generative models applied to clinical trial abstracts.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OntoCodex: a multi-agent biomedical ontology enrichment framework.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the field of structured information extraction, there are typically semantic and syntactic constraints on the output of information extraction (IE) systems. These constraints, however, can typically not be guaranteed using standard (fine-tuned) encoder-decoder architectures. This has led to the development of constrained decoding approaches which allow, e.g., to specify constraints in form of context-free grammars. An open question is in how far an IE system can be effectively guided by a domain-specific grammar to ensure that the output structures follow the requirements of a certain domain data model. Methods: In this work we experimentally investigate the influence of grammar-constrained decoding as well as pointer generators on the performance of a domain-specific information extraction system. For this, we consider fine-tuned encoder-decoder models, Longformer and Flan-T5 in particular, and experimentally investigate whether the addition of grammar-constrained decoding and pointer generators improve information extraction results. Toward this goal, we consider the task of inducing structured representations from abstracts describing clinical trials, relying on the C-TrO ontology to semantically describe the clinical trials and their results. We frame the task as a slot filling problem where certain slots of templates need to be filled with token sequences occurring in the input text. We use a dataset comprising 211 annotated clinical trial abstracts about type 2 diabetes and glaucoma for training and evaluation. Our focus is on settings in which the available training data is in the order of a few hundred training examples, which we consider as a Results: In all our experiments we could demonstrate the positive impact of grammar-constrained decoding, with an increase in Conclusion: The experimental results indicate that encoder-decoder models used for structure prediction for information extraction tasks in low-resource settings clearly benefit from grammar-constrained decoding guiding the output generation. In contrast, the evaluated pointer generator models decreased the performance drastically in some cases. Moreover, the performance of the pointer models appears to depend both on the used base model as well as the function used for aggregating the attention values. How the size of large language models affects the performance benefit of grammar-constrained decoding remains to be more structurally investigated in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.