ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Academic outcomes of inclusive education in typically developing children.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The fact that inclusive education has existed in Bosnia and Herzegovina for twenty years opens the question of how it affects typically developing children, among other things. This paper aims to examine the differences in general knowledge and mathematics of typically developing students with regard to whether they attend classes that include students with intellectual disabilities or not, as well as to determine the relationship of their knowledge with teachers' characteristics and the inclusiveness of schools they attend. Methods: The sample included 331 students from 18 regular elementary school classes. The sample was divided into two subsamples - respondents who attended classes that included students with intellectual disabilities and respondents who attended classes that did not include any students with disabilities. The Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two subsamples. The schools' inclusiveness was related to better achievements of all respondents, mainly in terms of work organization. The examined teachers' characteristics established different relationships with academic achievements in different subsamples. Conclusion: Attending classes with a student with intellectual disability did not negatively affect the academic achievements of other students in class. The school's inclusiveness in terms of work organization was positively related to the academic achievement of all students, while the relation of teachers' characteristics with students' achievements is a complex phenomenon that requires further research. Given the results obtained, to achieve better academic outcomes, teachers in classrooms attended by students with intellectual disability should be encouraged to use metacognitive and individualized teaching strategies. Furthermore, school principals and school administration would contribute to the success of all students by organizing the school on the principles of inclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.