Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839905›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Controversies in fecal incontinence.

Andreia Albuquerque, Satish S C Rao

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreia AlbuquerqueSchool of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, Gondomar 4420-096, Porto, Portugal.
Satish S C RaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a common condition that can significantly impact patients' quality of life. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anorectal surgeries are common etiologies. Endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry are important diagnostic tools for evaluating patients. There are various treatment options, including diet, lifestyle modifications, drugs, biofeedback therapy, tibial and sacral nerve neuromodulation therapy, and surgery. In this editorial, we will discuss current controversies and novel approaches to fecal incontinence. Screening for asymptomatic anal sphincter defects after obstetric anal sphincter injury and in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is not generally recommended, but may be helpful in selected patients. The Garg incontinence score is a new score that includes the assessment of solid, liquid, flatus, mucous, stress and urge fecal incontinence. Novel tests such as translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation and novel therapies such as translumbosacral neuromodulation therapy are promising diagnostic and treatment options, for both fecal incontinence and neuropathy. Home biofeedback therapy can overcome some limitations of the office-based therapy. Skeletal muscle-derived cell implantation of the external anal sphincter has been further studied as a possible treatment option. Sacral neuromodulation may be useful in scleroderma, congenital fecal incontinence and inflammatory bowel disease but merits further study.

Indexed as

Anal CanalFecal IncontinenceBiofeedback, PsychologyElectric Stimulation TherapyEndosonographyHumansManometryQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnal sphincter defectsBiofeedbackEndoanal ultrasoundFecal incontinenceNeuropathySacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID39839905
PMCPMC11684165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.