ArticleISME communications2025
Influences of fluctuating nutrient loadings on nitrate-reducing microorganisms in rivers.
Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and Functional Characteristics of Soil Microbial Communities in Forest-Wetland Ecotones: A Case Study of the Lesser Khingan Mountains.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of bacterial community characterization and host-bacteria interactions between bi-macroalgal blooms caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rivers serve important functions for human society and are significantly impacted by anthropogenic nutrient inputs (e.g. organic and sulfur compounds). Reduced organic and sulfur compounds influence the nitrogen cycle as they are electron donors of microbial nitrate reduction. Water pollution caused by individual nutrients and the mechanisms have been studied, but how the variation in multiple nutrient loadings influences nitrate-reducing microorganisms is less understood. Two sets of microcosms were established and exposed to nitrate, along with either acetate or thiosulfate, at different times. Nutrient concentrations responded to the loading pollutant. The nutrient loading order was more important in shaping microbial community structure and microbial interactions through the exchange of growth-required substances. This indicated that upstream or historical nutrient inflows impacted current nitrate reduction by changing the seeding microbial community, highlighting the importance of river connectivity. Based on metatranscriptome analysis, although the order and type of nutrient loadings were equally important in regulating global transcriptomes, transcripts of enzymes for key metabolisms (nitrate reduction, sulfur oxidation, etc.) more actively responded to the nutrient type. The regulation of a small set of genes was sufficient to make the transition, while most transcripts were not degraded and regenerated. These insights are important for understanding the varying pollution status of rivers and for developing effective solutions, such as remediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.