SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Statins and the incidence of post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Statins in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease: A 2021-2025 State-of-the-Art Review of Clinical and Preclinical Evidence.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Effects of Ninjin'yoeito and physical exercise on serum corticosterone and hippocampal BDNF/proBDNF and neuroinflammation in post-stroke depression in rats.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Research Advances in Multimodal Framework-Based Identification and Therapeutic Management of Post-Stroke Depression via the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
- Combination of flupentixol and melitracen tablets and rTMS improves post-stroke depression through neurovegetative symptoms changes: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Pathological stratification and therapeutic implications for post-stroke depression based on a multidimensional biomarker panel: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-stroke depression (PSD) can lead to poorer functional outcomes and prognosis. Brain inflammation is a risk factor for PSD. Statins might be beneficial due to their anti-inflammatory properties. Different studies have yielded varying results regarding the effects of statins. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to clarify the effect of statins on PSD. Methods: Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between PSD and the use of statins. Data Sources: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Eligibility Criteria: Original observational cohort studies. Participants: Patients with ischemic stroke. Interventions: Use of statins. Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Forest plot to display pooled results; Results: Of the 37 studies selected, four were eligible. The four studies included 93,893 patients (with statins: 45,598) and more than 17,470 PSD patients. The mean age ranged from 62.1 to 70.8 years. The percentage of female participants ranged from 42.1% to 57.9%. For PSD in different regions, the pooled OR for all regions using random-effects methods was 1.21 (95% CI: 0.44-3.33). The pooled OR for Asian populations was 1.42 (95% CI: 0.37-5.40), and for European populations, it was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78). The pooled OR for all regions using fixed-effects methods was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86). The pooled OR for Asian populations was 2.62 (95% CI: 2.34-2.93). Conclusion: Depending on the pooling method used, statin use in Asia either increased or had no relationship with PSD. For European patients, statin use reduced the incidence of PSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.