ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Monte Carlo study of proton LET calculations: Comparison between the codes PENHAN, FLUKA, and TOPAS.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Interface Between the BIANCA Biophysical Model and Geant4 for Particle Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Commissioning of a Monte Carlo-based scanning proton beam for breast cancer: Incorporating LETd calculations and variable RBE models.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- An ESTRO-EPTN Delphi consensus on robustness evaluation in proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Maintaining quality of scientific peer-review and publishing inPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Relative Biological Effectiveness-Clinical Practice at US Proton Therapy Centers.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- In vitro measurement of proton RBE: A multi-centric comparison using a harmonized setup.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Validation of fully automated intensity-modulated proton therapy with and without transmission beams for nasopharyngeal cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- New guidelines and recommendations to advance treatment planning in proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: In proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used to convert proton dose into an equivalent photon dose. However, RBE varies with tissue type, fraction dose, and beam quality parameters beyond dose such as linear energy transfer (LET) raising concerns about increased local effectiveness and potential toxicity. This work aims to harmonize quantities used for clinical consideration of variable RBE for proton therapy. Materials and methods: A survey was distributed to proton centres to determine agreement on RBE-related concerns and clinical implementations. A subsequent clinical expert meeting facilitated by the European Particle Therapy Network was held to achieve consensus and to make clinical recommendations how to prescribe and report beyond using dose and constant RBE. Results: The survey was answered by 17 out of 23 centres contacted (74%). For proton RBE, most concerns existed regarding toxicity in serial organs, while the assumption of an RBE of 1.1 was considered valid for targets. Most physicists intended to consider a physical quantity beyond dose in clinical decision making. Conclusions: A constant RBE of 1.1 was the consensus for prescribing dose. However, current practice of recording and reporting dose in proton therapy must be complemented: the recommended quantity beyond dose was the dose-averaged LET in water from primary and secondary protons, normalized to unit density. This will facilitate analyses of treatment data on effectiveness beyond dose and between centres. No consensus on a single variable RBE model was found. More clinical training on proton RBE is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.