ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Development of novel nomograms for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS ≤ 3 lesions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stratified Analysis of Patients Within the PSA Gray Zone (4-10 ng/mL) and Its Clinical Application Value: Development of a Predictive Model for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Quantitative Indicators of PSA, ADC, and Relative T2 Value.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- PSA proportion of index lesion: a novel index for predicting prostate pathology outcomes in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS 3 lesions.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop novel nomograms for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 score ≤ 3. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 327 men with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS score ≤ 3 from June 2020 to June 2024 in our hospital. Clinical data were compared among the PI-RADS scores 1-3 population, PI-RADS scores 1-2 population, and PI-RADS score 3 population. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for PCa or csPCa, and nomograms were subsequently developed. The nomograms were evaluated via receiver operating curves (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap methods. Results: Among the 327 patients, 224 (68.50%) were diagnosed with benign, 65 (19.87%) with csPCa, and 38 (11.62%) with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa). Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), lesion volume (LV), lesion location, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were found to be independent risk factors for PCa and csPCa in PI-RADS scores 1-3 population. PSAD and lesion location were independent risk factors for PCa in the PI-RADS scores 1-2 population, while PSAD, lesion location and ADC were independent risk factors for PCa in the PI-RADS score 3 population. Four nomograms were established based on these variables. For the population with PI-RADS scores 1-3, the area under the ROC (AUC) for predicting PCa and csPCa was 0.78 and 0.79, respectively. For patients with PI-RADS scores 1-2, the AUC for predicting PCa was 0.75. For patients with PI-RADS score 3, the AUC for predicting PCa was 0.78. The calibration curves revealed good concordance between the predicted probability and the actual probability. DCA demonstrated the net benefit of nomograms. Internal validation revealed strong discrimination of the nomograms. Conclusion: We developed novel nomograms with acceptable discriminability for predicting PCa and csPCa in patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS score ≤ 3. These models can assist urologists in determining the necessity of prostate biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.