Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839785›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

AI predicting recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: systematic review with study strengths and weaknesses.

Saram Abbas, Rishad Shafik, Naeem Soomro, Rakesh Heer, Kabita Adhikari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saram AbbasSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Rishad ShafikSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Naeem SoomroDepartment of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Rakesh HeerDivision of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kabita AdhikariSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) is notorious for its high recurrence rate of 70-80%, imposing a significant human burden and making it one of the costliest cancers to manage. Current prediction tools for NMIBC recurrence rely on scoring systems that often overestimate risk and lack accuracy. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming oncological urology by leveraging molecular and clinical data to enhance predictive precision. Methods: This comprehensive review critically examines ML-based frameworks for predicting NMIBC recurrence. A systematic literature search was conducted, focusing on the statistical robustness and algorithmic efficacy of studies. These were categorised by data modalities (e.g., radiomics, clinical, histopathological, genomic) and types of ML models, such as neural networks, deep learning, and random forests. Each study was analysed for strengths, weaknesses, performance metrics, and limitations, with emphasis on generalisability, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness. Results: ML algorithms demonstrate significant potential, with neural networks achieving accuracies of 65-97.5%, particularly with multi-modal datasets, and support vector machines averaging around 75%. Models combining multiple data types consistently outperformed single-modality approaches. However, challenges include limited generalisability due to small datasets and the "black-box" nature of advanced models. Efforts to enhance explainability, such as SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP), show promise but require refinement for clinical use. Conclusion: This review illuminates the nuances, complexities and contexts that influence the real-world advancement and adoption of these AI-driven techniques in precision oncology. It equips researchers with a deeper understanding of the intricacies of the ML algorithms employed. Actionable insights are provided for refining algorithms, optimising multimodal data utilisation, and bridging the gap between predictive accuracy and clinical utility. This rigorous analysis serves as a roadmap to advance real-world AI applications in oncological care, highlighting the collaborative efforts and robust datasets necessary to translate these advancements into tangible benefits for patient management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningNMIBCnon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerpredictionrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39839785
PMCPMC11746116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.