SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
AI predicting recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: systematic review with study strengths and weaknesses.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning model of contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for predicting post-BCG recurrence in high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive tools in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review of current insights and advances.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- A Machine Learning Framework for Prognostic Modeling in Stage III Colon Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pan-Cancer Targeted Sequencing Reveals Genomic Heterogeneity and Prognostic Subgroups in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in genitourinary pathology.Histopathology · 2026Review
- AI-mediated ultrasound radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: research progress and future challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) is notorious for its high recurrence rate of 70-80%, imposing a significant human burden and making it one of the costliest cancers to manage. Current prediction tools for NMIBC recurrence rely on scoring systems that often overestimate risk and lack accuracy. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming oncological urology by leveraging molecular and clinical data to enhance predictive precision. Methods: This comprehensive review critically examines ML-based frameworks for predicting NMIBC recurrence. A systematic literature search was conducted, focusing on the statistical robustness and algorithmic efficacy of studies. These were categorised by data modalities (e.g., radiomics, clinical, histopathological, genomic) and types of ML models, such as neural networks, deep learning, and random forests. Each study was analysed for strengths, weaknesses, performance metrics, and limitations, with emphasis on generalisability, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness. Results: ML algorithms demonstrate significant potential, with neural networks achieving accuracies of 65-97.5%, particularly with multi-modal datasets, and support vector machines averaging around 75%. Models combining multiple data types consistently outperformed single-modality approaches. However, challenges include limited generalisability due to small datasets and the "black-box" nature of advanced models. Efforts to enhance explainability, such as SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP), show promise but require refinement for clinical use. Conclusion: This review illuminates the nuances, complexities and contexts that influence the real-world advancement and adoption of these AI-driven techniques in precision oncology. It equips researchers with a deeper understanding of the intricacies of the ML algorithms employed. Actionable insights are provided for refining algorithms, optimising multimodal data utilisation, and bridging the gap between predictive accuracy and clinical utility. This rigorous analysis serves as a roadmap to advance real-world AI applications in oncological care, highlighting the collaborative efforts and robust datasets necessary to translate these advancements into tangible benefits for patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.