ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Real-world experiences with brentuximab vedotion-based regimens in systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a multi-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of brentuximab vedotin-based therapy in CD30-positive lymphomas in China: the prospective BRAVE study.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Updated Real-World Outcomes with Brentuximab Vedotin in Chinese Lymphoma Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma in pediatric and adolescent patients: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-utility analysis in China and the United States.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has demonstrated high remission rates in clinical trials for systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), yet its real-world effectiveness in China remains unconfirmed. This retrospective observational study evaluates BV-based regimens in patients with sALCL, treated from 2020 to 2023. Methods: A multi-center observational retrospective study was conducted on patients with sALCL received BV plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP) upfront or BV plus gemcitabine, oxaliplatin(GemOx), gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone(GDP), or isocyclophosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE)for later lines. Primary endpoints were complete response rate (CRR) and overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: Among the 38 patients (28 newly diagnosed and 10 with refractory/relapsed disease), the ORR were 100% (with 89.3% CR) for newly diagnosed patients and 70% (with 50% CR) for refractory/relapsed patients. The median duration of response was 14 months for newly diagnosed patients and 23.8 months for those with refractory/relapsed disease. 2-year Survival rates were 100% for newly diagnosed patients and 80% for refractory/relapsed patients, with 2-year PFS rates of 92.8% and 70%, respectively. Neurological toxicities were commonly observed but resolved following the completion of treatment. Conclusion: BV has proven to be effective and well-tolerated in real-world settings for the treatment of sALCL, reinforcing its potential as a promising option for first-line or subsequent therapy. The sustained efficacy observed post-CR suggests that these patients may have a prolonged disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.