Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Machine learning-based identification of proteomic markers in colorectal cancer using UK Biobank data.

Swarnima Kollampallath Radhakrishnan, Dipanwita Nath, Dominic Russ, Laura Bravo Merodio, Priyani Lad, Folakemi Kola Daisi, Animesh Acharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Swarnima Kollampallath RadhakrishnanCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dipanwita NathCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dominic RussCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Laura Bravo MerodioCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Priyani LadCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Folakemi Kola DaisiCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Animesh AcharjeeCollege of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the world. Incidence and mortality are predicted to rise globally during the next several decades. When detected early, colorectal cancer is treatable with surgery and medications. This leads to the requirement for prognostic and diagnostic biomarker development. Our study integrates machine learning models and protein network analysis to identify protein biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Our methodology leverages an extensive collection of proteome profiles from both healthy and colorectal cancer individuals. To identify a potential biomarker with high predictive ability, we used three machine learning models. To enhance the interpretability of our models, we quantify each protein's contribution to the model's predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanations values. Three classifiers-LASSO, XGBoost, and LightGBM were evaluated for predictive performance along with hyperparameter tuning of each model using grid search, with LASSO achieving the highest AUC of 75% in the UK Biobank dataset and the AUCs for LightGBM and XGBoost are 69.61% and 71.42%, respectively. Using SHapley Additive exPlanations values, TFF3, LCN2, and CEACAM5 were found to be key biomarkers associated with cell adhesion and inflammation. Protein quantitative trait loci analyze studies provided further evidence for the involvement of TFF1, CEACAM5, and SELE in colorectal cancer, with possible connections to the PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. By offering insights into colorectal cancer diagnostics and targeted therapeutics, our findings set the stage for further biomarker validation.

Indexed as

biomarkerscolorectal cancerdecision treemachine learningproteinsSHAPtranslational researchUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID39839775
PMCPMC11746037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.