SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, and the need for more effective treatment options is exceptionally pressing. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating GI cancers. Methods: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was conducted for articles on the treatment of GI cancers with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab, published from 2014 up to 30 August 2024. The inclusion criteria were designed according to the principles of Participants, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS). The control group was chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab in combination with other drugs. We extracted data from 10 randomized controlled trials and utilized a random effects model to assess the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), median duration of response (mDOR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4 and Stata version 12.0. Results: Overall, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated superior outcomes, including a higher ORR (OR = 1.69, P = 0.01), prolonged mOS (MD = 1.74, P = 0.04) and extended mDOR (MD = 5.64, P < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the ORR (OR = 1.75, P = 0.02) and mOS (MD = 5.02, P = 0.003) were significantly improved in patients with esophageal cancer. Notably, the ORR in patients with biliary cancer was significantly lower (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04). Additionally, the ORR was significantly higher in the NIVO1 + IPI3group (OR = 2.82, P = 0.01) and NIVO3 + IPI1 group (OR = 1.62, P = 0.01). Regarding safety, there was no statistically significant difference between the combination regimen and the control group in terms of any grade (OR = 0.72, P = 0.26) or grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.36, P = 0.14). Conclusions: Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated significant efficacy in GI cancers (especially esophageal cancer) without causing more adverse reactions. However, its efficacy in biliary cancer still needs to be further proven. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024590994.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.