ArticlemicroPublication biology2025
Improved RNA toehold switch sensitivity using the NanoLuc complementation reporter.
Article in microPublication biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthetic toehold biosensors for detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA toehold switches are powerful tools that can be used as biosensors to detect nearly any RNA sequence. In the presence of a specific RNA trigger, the toehold switch allows translation of a reporter protein. Toehold switches expressed in cell-free expression systems have been used as biosensors for several viruses and bacterial RNAs. Here we explore the use of the NanoLuc complementation reporter NanoBiT and found that it provides improved sensitivity over sfGFP. This reporter can be applied broadly across other RNA toehold switch applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.