ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2024
A Group Approach to Clinical Research Mentorship at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is committed to conducting research that improves the health and quality of life of veterans. Mentorship is vital for developing and advancing a novice VA investigator's research agenda; however, there are several barriers to effective research mentorship. Observations: The VA Clinical Research Mentorship Program was developed to assist clinician investigators with writing and submitting competitive grant applications. The program offers group and individualized consultation services utilizing the expertise of experienced investigators/faculty mentors, peer mentors, and other research staff. Since its inception in 2015, 35 clinicians have enrolled. Program mentees have submitted 33 grant proposals, with 19 approved for funding. Among participants who responded to a program evaluation survey, 17 reported (89%) that the meetings were an effective use of their time, 17 reported (89%) that the program increased their work satisfaction, and 13 reported (68%) that the program reduced clinician burnout. Conclusions: A group-based research mentorship program was positively viewed by participants, proved to be successful in helping mentees obtain funding for research, and had an impact on increasing participants' work satisfaction and reducing levels of burnout.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.