Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839686›Full record

ArticleMDM policy & practice

Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Donald R Sullivan, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Anne C Melzer, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Christopher G Slatore

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Donald R SullivanDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sara E GoldenDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0536-5853
Liana SchweigerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Anne C MelzerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Santanu DattaHealth Services Research, Management & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
James M DavisDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Renda Soylemez WienerCenter for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher G SlatoreDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX003067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highlights: We evaluated patients' preferred and actual decision-making role and decisional conflict following a decision-making interaction about lung cancer screening (LCS).Concordant decision-making preference was not associated with decisional conflict.Actual decision-making role was also not associated with decisional conflict.Efforts to enhance decision-making interactions may not decrease LCS decisional conflict.

Indexed as

care concordancecommunicationdecisional conflictlung cancer screeningshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39839686
PMCPMC11748413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.