ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Removal of an incarcerated intrauterine device reaching the serosal surface of the uterus by hysteroscopy alone: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An asymptomatic postmenopausal uterine perforation with bilateral embedment by a V-shaped intrauterine device: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used long-term contraceptive device for family planning. However, the IUD can lead to various complications. Severe complications and remedial measures caused by IUDs have been reported in the literature; however, detailed surgical approaches for safely removing the IUD within the minimum surgical range have rarely been described especially in postmenopausal women. Therefore, this article aims to share our surgical experience in removing an IUD that had reached the serosal surface of the uterus using hysteroscopy alone after menopause to provide new clinical ideas. Case introduction: We report the case of a 63-year-old Chinese patient with a 12-year history of menopause. She had an IUD placed after an abortion more than 30 years ago. She came to the hospital because of occasional a small amount of unprovoked vaginal bleeding, the preoperative examination suggested an embedded IUD that appeared to have reached the serosal surface of the uterus. The IUD was not visible during hysteroscopic surgery because of uterine adhesions. Microscissors were employed to cut along the white adhesion band, revealing a faintly visible metal wire. We successfully removed the IUD using hysteroscopy only. The patient has recovered well after surgery and has been in good health for more than 5 months, with no complaints of abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. Conclusion: This case suggests that hysteroscopic exploration can be performed in patients whose preoperative examination indicates that the IUD has reached or protrudes from the serosal surface of the uterus. If necessary, laparoscopic or open surgery can be performed. For patients whose IUD is not visible in the uterine cavity, preoperative imaging can help assess the thickness of the uterine myometrium and the distance to the serosal surface. Intraoperatively, scissors can cut through tissue or adhesions, and instruments can measure the separation distance or visualize the device within the adhesions. In addition, it is crucial to know the patient's expectations, assess the pros and cons, and discontinue the procedure if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.