ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Screening and evaluation of key technologies for non-bioartificial liver care: an empirical study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Informing Hospital Formulary Decisions in China: A Multi-Criteria Value Framework for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To identify key technologies within non-bioartificial liver (NBAL, an extracorporeal support system that temporarily replaces some of the liver's functions) nursing to offer guidance for clinical practice. In the context of NBAL nursing, key technologies are crucial for successful implementation of artificial liver treatment, ensuring patient safety, and enhancing nursing quality. A review of both domestic and foreign literature revealed that studies on NBAL nursing technology are lacking and that the key technologies for NBAL nursing have not been clearly identified. Methods: Using empirical research methods to collect and analyze data. First, the on-site survey method and literature research method were used to create a preliminary screening list of key technologies for NBAL care. Next, the focus group discussion method was used to establish the screening principles and evaluation indicators for these key technologies. Then, a two-round Delphi study via e-mail correspondence was used to screen and determine the key technologies for NBAL care. Finally, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) comprehensive evaluation method were applied to evaluate these key technologies for NBAL care. Results: Seventeen key technologies for NBAL care were identified. These include three basic nursing technologies, seven operating techniques, three items for treatment process monitoring technology, two items for health education, and two items for complication prevention and treatment technology. Conclusion: This study identified key NBAL nursing technologies, offering a systematic guide to enhance clinical practice. These technologies improve treatment safety, efficacy, and nursing standards, laying a foundation for NBAL care advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.