Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839592›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2023

The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach.

Jo Robinson, Pinar Thorn, Samuel McKay, Hannah Richards, Rikki Battersby-Coulter, Michelle Lamblin, Laura Hemming, Louise La Sala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Suicide Prevention in Youth.Current psychiatry reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jo RobinsonSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Pinar ThornSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Samuel McKaySuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Hannah RichardsSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Rikki Battersby-CoulterSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Michelle LamblinSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Laura HemmingSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Louise La SalaSuicide Prevention, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Concerns exist about the relationship between social media and youth self-harm and suicide. Study aims were to examine the extent to which young people and suicide prevention professionals agreed on: (1) the utility of actions that social media companies currently take in response to self-harm and suicide-related content; and (2) further steps that the social media industry and policymakers could take to improve online safety. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study nested within a larger Delphi expert consensus study. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature and roundtables with social media companies, policymakers, and young people informed the questionnaire development. Two expert panels were developed to participate in the overarching Delphi study, one of young people and one of suicide prevention experts; of them 43 young people and 23 professionals participated in the current study. The proportion of participants "strongly agreeing", "somewhat agreeing", "neither agreeing nor disagreeing", and "somewhat disagreeing" or "strongly disagreeing" for each item were calculated; items that achieved =>80% of agreement from both panels were strongly endorsed. Results: There was limited consensus across the two groups regarding the utility of the safety strategies currently employed by companies. However, both groups largely agreed that self-harm and suicide-related content should be restricted. Both groups also agreed that companies should have clear policies covering content promoting self-harm or suicide, graphic depictions of self-harm or suicide, and games, pacts and hoaxes. There was moderate agreement that companies should use artificial intelligence to send resources to users at risk. Just over half of professionals and just under half of young people agreed that social media companies should be regulated by government. There was strong support for governments to require schools to educate students on safe online communication. There was also strong support for international collaboration to better coordinate efforts. Discussion: Study findings reflect the complexity associated with trying to minimise the risks of communicating online about self-harm or suicide whilst capitalising on the benefits. However, a clear message was the need for better collaboration between policymakers and the social media industry and between government and its international counterparts.

Indexed as

self-harmsocial mediasuicidesurveyyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39839592
PMCPMC11748789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.