ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024
Comparison of long-term outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis treated with different immunosuppressive drugs.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Latest Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe compared long-term clinical outcomes between patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) who received no treatment (NT), steroid treatment (ST), disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNF).
methodsPatients from SSM healthcare system's data warehouse were identified using ICD codes. Inclusion criteria included at least 6 months of follow-up. Outcomes studied were heart failure (HF) admissions, ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA), and pacemaker/defibrillator placement. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.
resultsWe identified 198, 174, 66, and 19 patients in NT, ST, DMARDs, and TNF groups respectively. Mean age was 62.4, 60.2, 56, and 54.4 respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of medical comorbidities including pulmonary sarcoidosis between the groups. Mean follow up was 92.3 months. Percent incidences of VTA were 17.5, 16.3, 12.5, and 5.6 (P 0.57) in the NT, ST, DMARDs and TNF groups respectively. DMARDs and TNF groups had a lower incidence of HF admission (43.9% and 36.8%) compared to NT and ST (59.1% and 59.2%). In the multivariate model, compared to NT group, the odds ratio for HF admission was 1.08 (CI: 0.70-1.65), 0.64 (0.36-1.14) and 0.45 (0.17-1.20) in the ST, DMARDs and TNF groups respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of pacemaker/defibrillator placement between the groups.
conclusionIn this retrospective study from a large healthcare system, CS patients treated with DMARDs or TNF had a trend for lower incidence of HF admission than those on NT or ST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.