Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2024

Uncovering the hidden mechanics of upper body rotations in tennis serves using wearable sensors on Dutch professional players.

B van Trigt, E Faneker, A J R Leenen, A E Hoekstra, M J M Hoozemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B van TrigtDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
E FanekerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
A J R LeenenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
A E HoekstraRoyal Netherlands Lawn Tennis Association (KNLTB), Amstelveen, Netherlands.
M J M HoozemansDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is assumed that the tennis serve is performed according to the kinetic chain principle in which a proximal-to-distal sequence in peak angular velocities of subsequent body segments can be observed to reach high end point ball velocities. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the magnitude and (intersegmental) timing of peak angular velocities of body segments in professional tennis players are different between first and second serves and if they are associated with serve performance. Methods: Eight (two female and six male) professional tennis players performed each 48 tennis serves on a tennis court. Serve performances: Ball speed and accuracy were measured with a PlaySight system. Kinematics were assessed with a custom made high-end inertial measurement units (IMUs) system, sampled at 1,000 Hz. Magnitudes of, as well as the intersegmental timing between, three dimensional peak angular velocities of the pelvis, trunk, and dominant upper arm were analysed in relation to ball speed and accuracy with generalized estimating equations. Results: Peak angular velocities of the pelvis, trunk and upper arm were significantly higher in the first compared to the second serve. The intersegmental timing did not show significant differences. Also, the intersegmental timing was not associated with the ball speed. Ball speed was significantly positively associated with peak angular velocities of the trunk and upper arm on both the first and second serve. Accuracy was positively associated with the peak trunk angular velocity and intersegmental timing between the pelvis and trunk in the first serve. Accuracy was negatively associated with peak trunk angular velocity in the second serve. Conclusion: The arm movement is important to produce high ball speed during a tennis serve. Additionally, the trunk, proximal to the upper arm in the kinetic chain, showed associations with ball speed. In contrast to the upper arm also with accuracy. Interestingly, professional players do not strictly follow a proximal-to-distal sequence. Intersegmental timing appears to be less important in the tennis serve compared to the segmental angular velocities, which were higher in the first compared to the second serve. Future research should investigate the uncovered role of the trunk in relation to tennis serve performance.

Indexed as

angular velocityball speedbiomechanicsIMU systemintersegmental timingkinematicskinetic chain

Identifiers

PMID39839546
PMCPMC11746891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.