Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839506›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2025

Mortality and Length of Stay Implications of Deterioration-Associated Transfer to the Intensive Care Unit over Different Time Frames.

Kathy W Belk, Joseph Beals, Samantha J McInnis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathy W BelkHealth Clarity Solutions, Mooresville, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0964-9549
Joseph BealsHealth Clarity Solutions, Mooresville, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-4876
Samantha J McInnisSpacelabs Healthcare, Snoqualmie, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2607-5088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement initiatives in the acute care setting often target reduction of mortality and length of stay (LOS). Unplanned care escalations are associated with increased mortality risk and prolonged LOS, but may be precipitated by different factors, including appropriate triage, bed availability, and post-admission deterioration. Objectives: This work evaluates different transfer timeframes to quantify the impact of deterioration-associated unplanned transfers to intensive care (ICU) on mortality and LOS, informing evidence-based interventions to improve patient care. Design: This retrospective analysis examined 519 181 adult inpatients discharged from 15 hospitals in the United States. A propensity matched cohort analysis compared mortality and overall hospital LOS for patients admitted to routine and intermediate care units who did and did not have an unplanned ICU transfer within 12, 12-48, or ⩾48 hours from admission. Methods: Population cohorts were matched on age, sex, admitting unit type, admission type, and admission acuity. Multivariable regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of unplanned transfer on mortality and LOS. Sensitivity sub-analyses compared direct ICU admissions to unplanned ICU transfers using the same transfer timeframes and endpoints. Results: Patients with unplanned transfers in each of three timeframes had statistically higher mortality rates and longer LOS than matched cohorts without unplanned transfer. Differences between cohorts was greatest in patients transferring ⩾48 hours post-admission for both mortality (25.1% vs 1.9%, Conclusion: The association of later transfers with elevated mortality and LOS underscores the importance of timely intervention on patient deterioration.

Indexed as

deterioration-associated transfersemergency care escalationshospital mortalitylength of staypatient deteriorationUnplanned ICU transfers

Identifiers

PMID39839506
PMCPMC11748078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.