ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2024
Correlation analysis of selected anatomical and functional parameters of the urethra, assessed through ultrasound and urodynamic examinations.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to examine the correlations between specific urethral function parameters observed in urodynamic testing and selected urethral characteristics evaluated by pelvic floor ultrasonography. Additionally, the presence of urethral funneling during straining was evaluated in female patients referred for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 192 female patients referred for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence with the use of retropubic tension-free vaginal tape. Maximum urethral closure pressure and functional urethral length were evaluated urodynamically during resting profilometry. Ultrasound measurements, along with the assessment of funneling, were performed as part of the pelvic floor examination, following the technique described by Kociszewski. Patients with clinically significant pelvic organ prolapse, a history of anterior compartment surgery, prior radiotherapy, or symptoms of overactive bladder were excluded from the analysis. Results: The values obtained from urodynamic and ultrasound examinations were evaluated statistically. No correlation was identified between the analyzed urodynamic and ultrasound parameters. Long urethral funneling was confirmed in all patients with stress urinary incontinence assessed as eligible for the placement of tension-free vaginal tape. Conclusions: The results indicate that urodynamic and ultrasound examinations assess distinct aspects of urethral anatomy and function, and therefore their findings cannot be used interchangeably. Long urethral funneling assessed during pelvic floor ultrasonography was noted in all patients with clinically and urodynamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.