ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Evidence-based Algorithms for Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salvage surgery for free flap failure in the maxillofacial region: a comprehensive review of principles and outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Novel Porcine Xenograft as a Salvage Strategy for Lower Extremity Wound Reconstruction Following Free Flap Failure.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap has become the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Flap take-back to the operating room (OR) is an uncommon but difficult situation, requiring prompt and accessible resources. We conducted a literature review and independent expert review to inform evidence-based perioperative algorithms in the event of DIEP flap compromise. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted, including MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. Publications examining free flap re-exploration in breast reconstruction were used to inform evidence-based clinical algorithms. The algorithms then underwent expert review and revisions from 6 international experts in microsurgery. Results: Three evidence-based management algorithms were created. The first algorithm outlines perioperative management strategies to optimize patient care and prompt return to the OR. Nonconstricting flap inset after take-back, salvage medical strategies and postoperative management following flap failure were additionally included. Algorithms 2 (venous congestion) and 3 (vascular thrombosis) provide specific intraoperative strategies surrounding mechanical decompression, pedicle exposure, assessment and extraction of thrombosis, identification and use of alternative recipient vessels, and the usage of intraoperative thrombolytics. Conclusions: A coherent and stepwise approach to DIEP flap compromise in breast reconstruction was developed. These expert-reviewed algorithms provide an approachable and evidence-based structure to support return to the OR and serve as readily available resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.