Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839426›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Prevent for Work questionnaire.

Julia Blasco-Abadía, Pablo Bellosta-López, Víctor Doménech-García, Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen, Morten Hoegh, Pedro Berjano, Francesco Langella

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia Blasco-AbadíaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pablo Bellosta-LópezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.
Víctor Doménech-GarcíaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.
Thorvaldur Skuli PalssonDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Steffan Wittrup McPhee ChristensenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Morten HoeghDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pedro BerjanoDepartment of GSpine4, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Francesco LangellaDepartment of GSpine4, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal pain represents an increase in medical expenses due to disability and decreased quality of life among workers. Various biopsychosocial factors contribute to the development of persistent and disabling musculoskeletal pain. The Prevent for Work questionnaire (P4Wq) intended to analyze these factors. In this study, the original Italian version of the P4Wq was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish. Moreover, the psychometric properties were evaluated among Spanish workers with and without recent history of disabling spinal pain. Methods: The first phase consisted of a forward-and-backward translation process and evaluating the face-validity of the questionnaire among 30 Spanish workers. The second phase involved 153 Spanish workers who completed the P4Wq, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Finally, 50 Spanish workers completed the P4Wq 2 weeks later to evaluate test-retest reliability and measurement error. Results: Minor changes were made after the forward-and-backward translation process, which ensured that the Spanish versions was face-valid. The P4Wq demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for Spanish version (Cronbach's alpha: 0.91), a moderate negative association with the indicator of quality of life ( Conclusion: The Spanish version of the P4Wq was face-valid and exhibited a similar structure as the original version. Additionally, good internal consistency and construct validity were found. This translated version of the questionnaire can therefore be considered acceptable for use by workers with and without history of disabling musculoskeletal pain.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsdisabling painface validityforward-backward translationknown-groups validityminimal detectable changemusculoskeletal disordersoccupational settingreliability

Identifiers

PMID39839426
PMCPMC11747122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.