Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839344›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2024

Observation on the therapeutic effect of rolling the target muscle groups of lower limbs with foam rollers of different shore hardness on DOMS.

Yutong Lu, Wenhui Xue, Renxin Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yutong LuUniversity of Leeds Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Wenhui XueUniversity of Shanghai Sanda University No. 2727, Jinhai Road, Shanghai, China.
Renxin JiUniversity of Shanghai Sanda University No. 2727, Jinhai Road, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis experiment aims to explore how foam rollers of different Shore hardness affect DOMS, providing insights for sports therapy.

methodsForty participants from Shanghai Sanda University who have no habit of strength training, no lower limb injury, and meet the health standards were selected to conduct three experiments under the conditions of no intervention, using a 50 Shore hardness foam roller, and using a 60 Shore hardness foam roller, respectively. Data were recorded before and after modeling, as well as 24, 48, and 72 hours later.

resultsThere were no significant differences in various indicators among the three groups of subjects before and immediately after DOMS modeling (

conclusionsThe 60 Shore hardness foam roller is superior to the 50 Shore hardness foam roller in alleviating DOMS, improving joint range of motion, and enhancing athletic performance.

Indexed as

athletic performanceDOMSfoam rollingpainrange of motionshore hardness

Identifiers

PMID39839344
PMCPMC11744345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.