Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839323›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2024

Feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits of a creative arts intervention for elementary school children living with speech, language and communication disorders.

T Léger-Goodes, C M Herba, Z Moula, A Mendrek, K Hurtubise, J Piché, M Gilbert, M Bernier, K Simons, N Bélanger and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T Léger-GoodesDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
C M HerbaDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Z MoulaDepartment of Care in Long-Term Conditions, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
A MendrekDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
K HurtubiseFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J PichéDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
M GilbertDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
M BernierDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
K SimonsDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
N BélangerDepartment of Preschool and Primary Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
J SmithDepartment of Preschool and Primary Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
C Malboeuf-HurtubiseDepartment of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Children with speech, language, and communication disorders require specialized support in response to their emotional expression challenges. Not only is such support key for their development, but it is also essential for their mental well-being. Art making emerges as a valuable tool for enabling these children to convey emotions both verbally and non-verbally, fostering a positive self-concept. School-based arts interventions have the potential to improve self-concept and emotional expression, and more generally, the quality of life. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of a manualized, school-based creative arts intervention for this specific group. Aim: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits of an art-based intervention for elementary school students with speech, language, and communication disorders, using qualitative methods to obtain diverse perspectives. Results: The findings indicate that the intervention was feasible and well received, as reported by teachers, students, and facilitators. Participants also discussed potential positive outcomes, including emotional expression, emotional growth, and fulfilment of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs. Students found the workshops conducive to sharing emotions and took pride in the creative process. Teachers gained deeper insights into their students, fostering positive classroom relationships. Observational data triangulated these findings. Conclusion: This innovative project suggests that art-based interventions can potentially benefit students' emotional expression, but further experimental studies are needed to substantiate these effects.

Indexed as

art-based interventionchildren's mental healthcommunication difficulties (SLCD)languageschool-based interventionself-determination theory (SDT)speechtherapeutic arts

Identifiers

PMID39839323
PMCPMC11748800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.