ArticleCureus2025
Attitudes and Awareness Regarding Health Information Sought on Social Media by the Saudi Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferred Social Media Platform for Rehabilitation Education Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Cureus · 2026Article
- Sources of Knowledge, Family and Peer Support, Disclosure, and Posting on Social Media Platforms Among Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (SARDs): A Survey-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- The use of internet for health information by hospitalised patients in Switzerland and Qatar: a comparative cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Social media (SM) platforms are commonly used in Saudi Arabia, even for health information. SM platforms allow users to have conversations, share information, and create web content. Given the growing dependence on social media for health-related concerns, it is critical to understand how Saudis use these platforms to get health information. This study aimed to determine the Saudi population's attitude and awareness regarding health information sought on SM. Subject and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among adults in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from September to October 2024. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed randomly in the Medical City King Saud University family medicine clinic. The questionnaire includes socio-demographic data (i.e., age, gender, marital status, etc.), the most commonly used type of SM, and various questions to assess the knowledge and influence of SM on health information. Results Among the 330 participants, 117 (63%) were female respondents, and 126 (38.2%) were between 31 and 40 years old. WhatsApp was the most prominent type of SM used at 192 (58.2%). Disease or medical problems were the most notable health information being seen online at 172 (52.1%), and "to be informed" was the most common reason for seeking health information online at 237 (72.4%). The perception of unemployed female respondents that health information obtained from SM is reliable was significantly higher than that of unemployed male respondents (p<0.05). Surprisingly, male participants usually do believe SM can enhance awareness (p = 0.015). Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that SM influences the behavior of the adult population seeking health information in Saudi Arabia. Female participants tended to believe that the health information obtained from SM was credible. To be more informed was the primary reason for seeking health information online. There is a need to educate patients visiting family medicine clinics about the reliability of health information obtained online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.