ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Artificial intelligence models assisting physicians in quantifying pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for analyzing contrast-enhanced ultrasound reports of pancreatic cystic lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model based on non-contrast computed tomography within 24 hours of admission for early prediction of the risk of severe deterioration of acute pancreatitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning based on ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pancreatitis: A narrative review on advancing precision diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- An exploratory study of the diffusion tensor imaging analysis along perivascular spaces (DTI-ALPS) index combined with quantitative analysis of choroid plexus volume and perivascular spaces in different cognitive stages of cerebral small vessel disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by inflammation of the pancreas, which can lead to complications such as pancreatic necrosis. The modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI) is a widely used tool for assessing the severity of AP, particularly the extent of pancreatic necrosis. The accurate and timely assessment of the necrosis volume is crucial in guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. However, the current diagnostic process relies heavily on the manual interpretation of computed tomography (CT) scans, which can be subjective and prone to variability among clinicians. This study aimed to develop a deep-learning network model to assist clinicians in diagnosing the volume ratio of pancreatic necrosis based on the MCTSI for AP. Methods: The datasets comprised retrospectively collected plain and contrast-enhanced CT scans from 144 patients (6 with scores of 0 points, 42 with scores of 2 points, and 65 with scores of 4 points) and the National Institutes of Health contrast-enhanced CT scans from 45 patients with scores of 0 points. An improved fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation (V-Net) model was developed to segment the pancreatic volume (i.e., the whole pancreas, necrotic pancreatic tissue, and non-necrotic pancreatic tissue) and to quantify the split volume ratios. The improved strategy included three stages of body up- and down-sampling adapted to the task of segmentation in AP, and the selection of objects, loss function, and smoothing coefficients. The model interpretations were compared with those of clinicians with different levels of experience. The reference standard was manually segmented by a pancreatic radiologist. Accuracy, macro recall, and macro specificity were employed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the model and the clinicians. Results: In total, 144 patients (mean age: 44±13 years; 40 females, 104 males) were included in the study. Optimal training results were obtained using the necrotic pancreatic tissue and whole pancreas as the input objects, and combining dice loss and 500 smoothing coefficients as the loss function for training. The dice coefficient for the whole pancreas was 0.811 and that for the necrotic pancreatic tissue was 0.761. The performance of the artificial intelligence model and clinicians were compared. The accuracy, macro recall, and macro specificity of the improved V-net were 0.854, 0.850 and 0.923, respectively, which were all significantly higher than those of the senior and junior clinicians (P<0.05). Conclusions: Our proposed model could improve the effectiveness of clinicians in diagnosing pancreatic necrosis volume ratios in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.