Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839052›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

High performance of the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging biomarker diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) for separating placentas associated with pre-eclampsia from placentas in normal pregnancy.

Cai-Ying Li, Lei Chen, Fu-Zhao Ma, Jian-Qiang Chen, Yue-Fu Zhan, Yì Xiáng J Wáng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MRI signal simulation of liverQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Influences of the second motion probing gradientQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cai-Ying Li *Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lei Chen *Department of Radiology, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Centre, Haikou, China.
Fu-Zhao MaDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jian-Qiang ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Yue-Fu ZhanDepartment of Radiology, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Centre, Haikou, China.
Yì Xiáng J WángDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-0717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) is a surrogate of the area of micro-vessels per unit tissue. DDVD is calculated according to: DDVD (b0b50) = Sb0/ROIarea0 - Sb50/ROIarea50, where Sb0 and Sb50 refer to the tissue signal when Methods: Diffusion-weighted images with Results: The DDVD values of the control placentas [n=44, median: 67.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.84-79.46] were significantly higher than those of the PE patients (n=25, median: 23.66, 95% CI: 17.22-45.57, P<0.0001), while there was no difference of the fetal brain DDVD values of the control cases (median: 29.5, 95% CI: 25.46-34.62) and those of PE patients (median: 33.6, 95% CI: 27.82-35.39, P=0.41). DDVDr results of the control cases (median: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.57-2.50) and PE patients (median: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.18, P<0.0001) were significantly different, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84 for separation. The AUROC was 0.92 for separation when only cases with gestation age (GA) ≤35 weeks were considered (control n=20, PE n=9). If only PE patients with fetal growth restriction (n=8) were compared with the controls (n=44), then AUROC was 0.96 for the separation. A trend was noted with GA and DDVDr negatively correlated in the control group (r=-0.26, P=0.085); however, such a trend was not observed for PE patients. A trend was observed with systolic blood pressure and DDVDr negatively correlated (r=-0.328, P=0.117). Conclusions: DDVDr may play an important role in patient PE prediction and follow-up.

Indexed as

Diffusion-weighted imagingperfusionplacentapre-eclampsia (PE)pregnancies

Identifiers

PMID39839052
PMCPMC11744101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.