Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839051›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Assessment of intratumor heterogeneity for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules.

Hongliang Qi, Zhichao Zuo, Shanyue Lin, Ye Chen, Hanwei Li, Debin Hu, Yingjun Zhou, Wanyin Qi, Hongwen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hongliang Qi *Department of Clinical Engineering, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhichao Zuo *School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China.
Shanyue Lin *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Ye ChenDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanwei LiDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Debin HuDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingjun ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China.
Wanyin QiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Hongwen ChenDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increased use of low-dose computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has improved the detection of ground-glass nodules. However, as the clinical utility of CT findings to predict the invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) is currently limited, differentiating pGGNs that indicate invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from those that represent other histological entities is challenging. We aimed to quantify intratumor heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinomas characterized by pGGNs on CT to assess its efficacy in predicting IACs before surgery. Methods: Overall, 575 patients with persistent pGGNs and a postoperative pathological diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma were included. To quantitatively measure intratumor heterogeneity, an intratumor heterogeneity score that incorporated local radiomics features and global pixel distribution patterns was developed. Accuracy of the preoperative prediction of pathological invasiveness was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The performance of the intratumor heterogeneity score was compared with that of radiomics features and conventional imaging findings. Results: Conventional imaging findings yielded area under the curve values of 0.832 and 0.842 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The performance of imaging findings was inferior to that of radiomics, which yielded area under the curve values of 0.868 and 0.879 for the training (P=0.008) and validation (P=0.007) cohorts, respectively. Similarly, the performance of imaging findings was inferior to that of the intratumor heterogeneity score, with area under the curve values of 0.860 and 0.867 for the training (P=0.019) and validation (P=0.045) cohorts, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the intratumor heterogeneity score was comparable to that of radiomics features, with no significant difference between their ROC curves (training: P=0.635; validation: P=0.686). Conclusions: The performance of the intratumor heterogeneity score was comparable to that of radiomics features and superior to that of conventional imaging findings for the preoperative prediction of the IACs that present as pGGNs.

Indexed as

Intratumor heterogeneity score (ITH score)invasivenesspredictionpulmonary adenocarcinomaspure ground-glass nodule (pGGN)

Identifiers

PMID39839051
PMCPMC11744125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.